Kanal manzili:
Toifalar:
Tillar
Til: Oʻzbek tili
Obunachilar:
15.36K
Kanalning ta’rifi
EFL teacher.
BA and MA in English studies.
Love traveling, books, and simple life.
Authentic materials and innovative approach for IELTS
💡Writing lessons🏃🏼🏃🏼🏃🏻♀️
Group 💬 : https://t.me/ ehnqW-4cKvVlMGRi
📚Library: @libaryof (free books)
Ratings & Reviews
Reviews can be left only by registered users. All reviews are moderated by admins.
5 stars
0
4 stars
0
3 stars
1
2 stars
1
1 stars
1
Oxirgi xabar 4
2023-06-21 14:52:10
The graphs illustrate the proportions of different films shown on TV in the UK and Australia as well as the number of admissions in those countries between 1975 and 2005.
It is, overall, striking that the US films dominated TVs in both countries. Noticeably, the count for admissions generally increased both in the UK and Australia, with the former showing relatively higher figures over the span covered.
Looking at the chart A, first, it is clear that Australian and British televisions were primarily constituted by US-made films in 2001, at approximately 66 % and 76 % respectively. By stark contrast, while films produced in the UK were somewhat popular in the UK itself, at about 20%, merely 2 % of TV content in Australia was made up by Australian films.
As for the chart B, the number of admissions in Australia (25 m) was nowhere near as high as that in UK (100m) in 1975. By 1983, surprisingly, the gap between those figures had been shrunk out and the admission numbers in the UK were practically two times as much as the count for Australia, showing the respective numbers of about 48 m and 24m. Finally, in 2005, the UK gave just over 160 m admissions to cinemas, whereas Australia granted the half of this figure.
7.9K viewsZafar Sobitov, 11:52
2023-06-21 14:51:58
7.0K viewsZafar Sobitov, 11:51
2023-06-19 05:10:53
The most useful books for learning writing task 1
8.0K viewsZafar Sobitov, 02:10
2023-06-19 05:10:26
@zafarsobitoff
7.7K viewsZafar Sobitov, edited 02:10
2023-06-19 05:10:00
@zafarsobitoff
7.6K viewsZafar Sobitov, edited 02:10
2023-06-19 05:07:56
@zafarsobitoff
7.5K viewsZafar Sobitov, edited 02:07
2023-06-18 18:18:17
Qaysi qilgan amalim uchun Alloh sendek yaxshi insoni menga bergan qiyomatliligim
7.8K viewsZafar Sobitov, edited 15:18
2023-06-06 10:31:55
Men sizga multi-level ga tayyorlanish uchun tavsiya qila oladigan yana bir ishonchli kanal
3.1K views07:31
2023-06-06 08:35:56
If you need any help with Multilevel, you are welcome to "All or Nothing".
@ALL_OR_NOTHING_LC
@ALL_OR_NOTHING_LC
@ALL_OR_NOTHING_LC
3.7K views05:35
2023-06-05 05:55:58
The table compares the changes in the shares of jobless people in labor force in nine different nations in two separate years (1994 and 2004).
Overall, it is clear that while Ireland as well as Poland ranked first in terms of unemployment rates in 1994 and 2004 respectively, the opposite was true for Japan only in the year 1994. Interestingly, there were the same proportions of unemployed individuals in the USA and Australia in 2004.
Focusing on increasing trends first, initially, 12.4% and 7% of people were jobless in Poland as well as Germany accordingly, thereafter which the former rose markedly to about a fifth in 2004. The latter, meanwhile, grew minimally to 9.4%. As for Australia and Japan, these two began the period with a mere 5% and 2.7% and closed the study list with 5.4% and 4.7% correspondingly.
With respect to decreasing trends, the ratios of the unemployed in Ireland and Canada decreased from 14.8% to 4.4% and from 10.6% to 7.7% in accordance. By sharp contrast, for the UK and the USA, the corresponding proportions were 9.5 and 7.2 percent in 1994 and 4.7 and 5.4 percent in 2004. Regarding Italy, it saw a slight fall from 11.8% to 8.4%.203 words
5.4K views02:55
Z
